Subacromial Impingement Syndrome and Subacromial Pain Syndrome
SIS and SAPS — it’s more complex than “a bone rubbing on a tendon”
Get WISE - Get WELL
- Get ON
If you’ve been told you have shoulder impingement, you’ve probably been shown the classic explanation: the rotator cuff tendon is being “pinched” under a bony roof. Sometimes that mechanical idea is relevant — but for most people it’s not the full story. The shoulder is one of the most complex joints in the body. If you want a clearer picture of how the joint works, it helps to understand the basic anatomy of the shoulder.
Subacromial pain is usually a load and tissue-capacity problem involving the rotator cuff and bursa, influenced by strength, movement control, irritation levels and how the shoulder is being used. This page explains what impingement really means, why the term has evolved, how it’s diagnosed properly, and what actually helps you recover.
This page explains:
-
What Is Subacromial Pain Syndrome?
-
Why Language Matters
-
What Actually Happens in Subacromial Pain Syndrome
-
Where Problems Begin
-
Load-Related Irritability
-
Why “Impingement” Is an Incomplete Explanation
-
Intrinsic vs Extrinsic Theories — What the Evidence Suggests
-
When It Is Probably Not Subacromial Impingement
-
Treatment and Management
-
Recovery and Prognosis
-
Summary
-
Shoulder Impingement FAQ's
What Is Subacromial Inpingement Syndrome?
The term impingement was originally coined to describe a mechanical idea: that the rotator cuff tendon was being repeatedly compressed against the underside of the acromion a it passes through the narrow channel — the 'bony roof of the shoulder' — primarily during shoulder abduction and shoulder internal rotation.
This explanation found its way into textbooks and patient leaflets for decades. Images of bone spurs “rubbing” on tendons made intuitive sense. Unfortunately, common sense is not the same as clinical truth.
While structural narrowing of the subacromial space can exist, imaging studies show many people have spurs or reduced space without pain or dysfunction. And others have significant shoulder pain with perfectly normal imaging.
What we now understand is that pain in this region is rarely explained solely by bony structures.
Terminology has therefore evolved.
Clinicians now increasingly use the term Subacromial Pain Syndrome to reflect a broader, more accurate understanding:
pain arising from the tendons (especially the rotator cuff), the subacromial bursa, and related soft tissues in the region under the acromion, often driven by load intolerance and altered tissue capacity, not just mechanical compression.
Why Language Matters When Naming Conditions
Labels shape understanding — both for patients and clinicians.
When we describe shoulder pain as “bone rubbing on tendon,” two problematic assumptions follow:
-
The problem is structural and fixed, and
-
Forceful approaches or surgery are necessary to create space.
Modern evidence does not support those assumptions for most people. Instead, pain in this area usually reflects how the tissues are being loaded, how sensitive they are, and how the shoulder is moving overall.
For this reason, Subacromial Pain Syndrome has become a preferred term, because it focuses attention on:
-
Pain drivers
-
Tissue load capacity
-
Functional movement
-
Sensitisation and irritability
-
Strength and coordination deficits
rather than on an oversimplified mechanical squeeze.
What Actually Happens in Subacromial Pain Syndrome?
To understand subacromial pain properly, it helps to understand the anatomy involved.
The subacromial space sits between the head of the humerus (the ball of the shoulder) and the acromion (the bony arch forming the roof of the shoulder). Passing through this space are several important structures:
-
The supraspinatus tendon (part of the rotator cuff)
-
Portions of the infraspinatus tendon
-
The long head of biceps tendon (anteriorly)
-
The subacromial bursa, a fluid-filled cushioning structure
The bursa acts as a friction-reducing layer, allowing the rotator cuff tendons to glide smoothly beneath the acromion during movement.
In a healthy shoulder, this space is dynamic — not fixed. As the arm elevates, the humeral head must remain centred in the socket. The rotator cuff muscles work continuously to control this positioning, preventing excessive upward migration. The scapula (shoulder blade) also rotates and tilts to help maintain clearance.
This coordination is critical.
When this system is working well, tissues pass beneath the acromion without irritation.
Where Problems Begin
Subacromial pain syndrome typically arises not from a single dramatic compression event, but from a mismatch between load and tissue capacity.
Several processes can contribute:
1. Supraspinatus Tendon Overload
The supraspinatus tendon plays a key role in arm elevation and dynamic stabilisation. Repetitive overhead work, rapid increases in training volume, or prolonged sustained positioning can exceed the tendon’s current capacity. In some cases symptoms overlap with rotator cuff tears.
When this occurs, the tendon may become:
-
Biologically sensitised
-
Reactive
-
Painful under compression or tensile load
This does not necessarily mean the tendon is torn. It often reflects tendon reactivity — a load response.
2. Subacromial Bursa Irritation
The bursa is richly innervated and highly sensitive. When irritated, it can become inflamed and thickened. Because it lies directly beneath the acromion, bursal inflammation (bursitis) can produce sharp, well-localised pain during elevation.
Interestingly, in many cases the bursa may be the dominant pain generator rather than the tendon itself.
3. Altered Motor Control
The shoulder is not a static joint. If the rotator cuff is weak or fatigued, the humeral head may translate slightly upward during movement. This subtle change in mechanics can increase compression forces within the subacromial space.
Similarly, reduced scapular upward rotation or posterior tilt can influence how the acromion sits relative to the humeral head. These changes are usually small — but over thousands of repetitions, small alterations in force distribution can increase tissue stress. Another common example of altered motor control would be in cases of shoulder instability after repeated shoulder trauma such as subluxations or dislocations, clavicle fractures or in fact any case where there has been continued reinforcement of non-normal movement patterns, normally in response to pain.
It is important to remember that shoulder pain rarely develops from a single isolated factor. More commonly it reflects a gradual interaction between tissue capacity, movement patterns, and the loads placed on the shoulder over time.
Other examples could include conditions affecting the elbow, wrist, or cervical spine. Pain from disorders such as tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis), golfer’s elbow (medial epicondylitis), De Quervain’s tenosynovitis, neck pain, cervical radiculopathy, or even irritation of the brachial plexus can subtly alter how the upper limb is used during everyday activities. When discomfort is present, people naturally modify how they lift, reach, or carry objects in order to avoid provoking symptoms. Over time these compensations can change shoulder loading patterns, particularly during repeated movements, and may contribute to the development or persistence of shoulder symptoms even though the primary source of pain originated elsewhere in the upper limb.
Importantly, these are modifiable factors.
4. Tendon Sensitivity Rather Than Structural Failure
One of the most misunderstood aspects of subacromial pain is the relationship between imaging findings and symptoms.
Many individuals demonstrate:
-
Tendinopathy changes
-
Mild degenerative changes
-
Acromial spurs
without any shoulder pain.
Conversely, some people have significant symptoms with minimal structural change visible on imaging.
Pain in subacromial pain syndrome is often driven by tissue sensitivity and load intolerance, not by gross structural damage.
This is why imaging alone rarely provides the full explanation and it really pays to get a thorough physiotherapy assessment by a trusted clinician.
Ultrasound Versus MRI In Shoulder Assessment
Ultrasound scanning can be particularly useful in shoulder assessment because it allows the radiographer to observe structures while the shoulder is moving. During the examination you may be asked to raise or rotate your arm so the sonographer can watch how the tendons and soft tissues behave dynamically. This can be helpful because most shoulder pain occurs during movement rather than at rest, whereas many imaging tests capture only static pictures.
However, ultrasound has some limitations. Because ultrasound waves reflect strongly from bone, deeper structures can sometimes be difficult to visualise. For example, the acromion can obscure the subacromial space, the scapula can limit visualisation of the subscapularis muscle, and the humeral head may block views of deeper joint structures such as the glenoid labrum. In these situations ultrasound may either miss pathology or simply be unable to produce a clear image.
If an ultrasound scan appears normal but symptoms persist despite appropriate rehabilitation, or if the clinician suspects a deeper joint problem such as labral injury or intra-articular pathology, an MRI scan may be recommended. MRI does not capture movement in the same way as ultrasound, but it provides much more detailed images of joint structures and can highlight areas of tissue damage, inflammation, or bone stress.
As discussed elsewhere on this site, it is important to remember that imaging findings do not always perfectly match symptoms. Changes such as tendon degeneration or small rotator cuff tears can sometimes be seen on scans in people who have no shoulder pain at all. For this reason imaging should always be interpreted alongside a careful clinical or physiotherapy assessment rather than being treated as a diagnosis on its own.
In some cases a specialist may request an MR arthrogram, where a small amount of contrast dye is injected into the joint before the scan. This can help outline structures such as the labrum in greater detail. Arthrograms are used less frequently than in the past but can still be helpful in specific situations. You can read more about this on the MR arthrogram page.
Load-Related Irritability
Subacromial pain is typically load-related. Symptoms often appear when the shoulder is challenged in ways that exceed its current tolerance:
-
Repetitive overhead activity
-
Sudden increases in gym training
-
Manual work at shoulder height
-
Sustained reaching tasks
When load exceeds capacity, tissues become reactive. Pain serves as a warning signal — not necessarily a marker of irreversible damage but more of a ' continue at your own risk' type of sign.
Over time, if load remains excessive without adaptation, symptoms persist. Conversely, when load is reduced temporarily and then progressively reintroduced, tissues often adapt and symptoms settle.
Why “Impingement” Is an Incomplete Explanation
The classic mechanical impingement model suggests that the acromion compresses the tendon during elevation.While compression does occur physiologically, it is a normal part of shoulder mechanics.
The problem is not compression alone. It is:
-
Compression combined with reduced tissue capacity
-
Compression in an already sensitised tendon
-
Repeated load beyond adaptation
-
Poor force distribution during movement
In short, the issue is usually not “bone on tendon.” It is tissue capacity in a dynamic system. That distinction matters because it changes management entirely.
Intrinsic vs Extrinsic Theories — What the Evidence Suggests
The debate around subacromial impingement has historically centred on two broad explanations: extrinsic compression and intrinsic tendon pathology.
Understanding both helps clarify why the terminology evolved — and why management should be individualised rather than dogmatic.
The Extrinsic (Mechanical Compression) Model
The original impingement theory, popularised by Neer, proposed that structural narrowing beneath the acromion led to repetitive compression of the rotator cuff tendons during elevation.
According to this model, contributing factors might include:
-
A “hooked” acromion
-
Acromial spurs
-
Thickened coracoacromial ligament
-
Upward migration of the humeral head
The logical treatment conclusion was to increase the available space — either by modifying mechanics or surgically removing bone (subacromial decompression). There is some truth here.
Mechanical compression does occur. In certain individuals — particularly those with clear structural narrowing and correlating symptoms — extrinsic factors may contribute meaningfully. But the model has limitations. Many individuals have structural narrowing or spurs and no symptoms. Others have significant pain with normal bony anatomy.
Decompression surgery has not consistently outperformed structured rehabilitation in large studies.
This suggests that compression alone does not explain most cases.
The Intrinsic (Tendon-Driven) Model
The intrinsic theory proposes that pain arises primarily from changes within the tendon itself (tendinpathy).
Over time, repetitive loading may lead to:
-
Tendon reactivity
-
Collagen disorganisation
-
Increased cellular activity
-
Reduced load tolerance
In this model, compression is secondary. A sensitised or reactive tendon is simply less able to tolerate normal compressive and tensile forces. Rather than bone crushing a healthy tendon, we are often seeing a tendon that has exceeded its capacity becoming symptomatic under normal biomechanical conditions.
This explains why:
-
Load modification improves symptoms
-
Progressive strengthening improves tolerance
-
Imaging findings do not always correlate with pain
-
Surgery is not universally effective
The Modern Perspective — A Combined Model
Current understanding is less binary. In reality, most cases likely involve a combination of:
-
Tendon load intolerance
-
Bursal sensitivity
-
Dynamic movement factors
-
Individual anatomical variation
Compression may contribute — but it is rarely the sole driver.
A shoulder with reduced strength and altered motor control may experience greater compressive forces during elevation. A sensitised tendon may interpret normal compression as painful. A thickened bursa may reduce available space dynamically.
The system is interactive.
This is why management must address:
-
Tissue capacity
-
Movement quality
-
Strength
-
Load exposure
rather than focusing exclusively on structural “space.”
Why This Debate Matters Clinically
The intrinsic vs extrinsic debate is not academic.
It influences:
-
Whether patients are told they have a “structural problem”
-
Whether surgery is presented as inevitable
-
Whether rehabilitation focuses on strength or passive space creation
An overly rigid mechanical explanation can increase fear and reduce confidence in movement. An overly dismissive stance on anatomy can ignore genuine structural contributors in selected cases.
The balanced approach recognises:
In some individuals, structural factors matter. In many, tissue capacity and load tolerance matter more. Clinical reasoning determines which model fits best.
What Other Conditions Can Mimic the Symptoms?
Not every painful shoulder that hurts when lifting the arm is impingement. Subacromial pain has a recognisable pattern, and when that pattern is absent, the diagnosis should be reconsidered.
If passive movement is globally restricted — particularly external rotation — frozen shoulder is more likely. If there was a clear traumatic event followed by immediate weakness or inability to lift the arm, a rotator cuff tear or potential long head of biceps Injury should be considered first. If crossing the arm across the body causes pain on the front of the shoulder then this could be an acromioclavicular joint issue.
If pain is located deep within the joint and accompanied by catching or locking, shoulder instability or labral pathology may need evaluation.
If symptoms are constant, severe at rest, and unrelated to movement, alternative diagnoses should be explored.
Similarly, if neck movement reproduces shoulder symptoms, cervical referral should not be overlooked. Subacromial pain syndrome typically presents with:
-
Pain during active elevation
-
A painful arc through mid-range
-
Preserved passive range once pain settles
-
Load-related aggravation
-
Relative strength preservation (unless pain-inhibited)
When those features are absent, attaching the impingement label may oversimplify the presentation.
Accurate diagnosis matters. Treating a frozen shoulder like impingement will not restore range. Treating a rotator cuff tear like simple tendon overload may delay appropriate referral.
The label should follow the clinical reasoning — not the other way around.
Treatment and Management
Management of subacromial pain syndrome should be guided by the dominant driver of symptoms — not by the label alone.
In most cases, treatment focuses on improving tissue load capacity, strength, and movement quality, rather than attempting to “create space.” The approach should be progressive, individualised, and responsive to irritability levels.
1. Managing Irritability (Early or Reactive Phase)
When symptoms are highly reactive — sharp pain with elevation, night discomfort, flare-ups after activity — the initial goal is to settle irritability without causing deconditioning.
This may involve:
-
Temporarily modifying overhead or repetitive tasks
-
Adjusting gym or manual workloads
-
Reducing provocative sustained positions
-
Introducing low-load, tolerable movement
-
Medication
The aim is not complete rest, it is controlled loading. Complete avoidance often weakens the system further. Excessive loading prolongs irritation. Finding the middle ground is key.
During this stage, gentle isometrics and low-load rotator cuff activation can help maintain capacity without exacerbating symptoms.
2. Rebuilding Load Capacity
Once irritability is better controlled, rehabilitation should shift toward strengthening. This is the cornerstone of recovery.
Targeted strengthening of:
-
Supraspinatus
-
Infraspinatus
-
Subscapularis
-
Scapular stabilisers
improves dynamic control of the humeral head and reduces compressive stress under load. Importantly, strengthening should be progressive. Light exercises alone rarely restore full capacity. The tendon must gradually be exposed to increasing loads to adapt.
Progression may involve:
-
Increased resistance
-
Greater range
-
Slower tempo
-
Functional overhead patterns
The objective is not pain elimination during exercise — mild, tolerable discomfort is often acceptable — but symptom behaviour must settle predictably within 24 hours.
3. Movement Quality and Motor Control
Altered movement patterns often develop alongside pain. Common examples include:
-
Excessive shoulder shrugging during elevation
-
Reduced scapular upward rotation
-
Trunk leaning to compensate for weakness
-
Poor Proprioception
Rehabilitation should address these patterns — not through rigid posture correction, but through improving strength and coordination so efficient movement emerges naturally.
The goal is confident, controlled elevation — not forced positioning.
4. Role of Manual Therapy
Hands-on techniques may reduce irritability, improve short-term range, or assist with pain modulation. However, they should support — not replace — active rehabilitation. Passive techniques alone do not build tendon capacity.
Used appropriately, they can create a window for better quality loading.
In more chronic presentations where there is not thought to be a structural root causes, but more tissue scarring or subtherapeutic healing has occurred, proinflammatory treatment options such as shockwave therapy may be considered prior to more invasive injection therapy or surgery.
5. Injections
Subacromial corticosteroid injections may reduce pain in selected cases, particularly when irritability is high and limiting rehabilitation progress.
They can:
-
Reduce bursal inflammation
-
Lower pain sensitivity
-
Create a window for exercise progression
However, injections do not correct load intolerance or restore strength. Used without structured rehabilitation, symptom relief is often temporary. They should be considered a tool — not a solution.
6. Surgery
Subacromial decompression surgery aims to increase space beneath the acromion. Evidence shows that for many people with typical subacromial pain syndrome, outcomes following decompression are similar to well-structured rehabilitation such as physiotherapy.
This suggests that in many cases, improving tissue capacity addresses the underlying problem more effectively than removing bone.
However, surgery may be appropriate when:
-
Conservative management has been delivered properly and persistently
-
Structural contributors correlate strongly with symptoms
-
Functional limitation remains significant
-
Clinical reasoning supports mechanical factors
The key is appropriate selection. Surgery is neither universally necessary nor universally ineffective.
Recovery and Prognosis
Most cases of subacromial pain syndrome improve with structured, progressive rehabilitation. Recovery timelines vary depending on:
-
Duration of symptoms
-
Irritability level
-
Baseline strength
-
Occupational demands
-
Adherence to rehabilitation
Mild cases may improve within 6–8 weeks. More established or recurrent cases may require 3–6 months of progressive loading before full confidence and strength return. Flare-ups are common, particularly when activity increases faster than tissue adaptation.
These flare-ups do not necessarily indicate structural worsening — they often reflect temporary overload. Long-term outcomes are generally favourable when strength and load capacity are restored.
The focus should be on building a resilient shoulder — not simply reducing pain temporarily.
Summary — Subacromial Impingement / Subacromial Pain Syndrome
Subacromial impingement — increasingly referred to as subacromial pain syndrome — describes pain arising from the tissues beneath the acromion, most commonly involving the rotator cuff tendons and subacromial bursa.
While traditionally explained as a problem of “bone rubbing on tendon,” modern understanding recognises that the condition is usually driven by a combination of:
-
Tendon load intolerance
-
Altered movement patterns
-
Reduced strength and tissue capacity
Compression does occur during normal shoulder movement — but it is rarely the sole cause of pain. Diagnosis is based on clinical reasoning, not imaging alone. Many structural findings on scans are common in people without symptoms. What matters most is how the shoulder behaves under load.
Management focuses on restoring tissue capacity through progressive strengthening, appropriate load exposure, and improving movement quality. Injections and surgery may have a role in selected cases — but they are not first-line solutions for most people.
Recovery is typically gradual and depends on rebuilding strength and resilience rather than “creating more space.” The goal is not just symptom reduction. It is confident, durable shoulder function.
Educational Notice
This content is intended for educational guidance only and reflects current evidence and clinical reasoning at the time of publication. It does not replace individual assessment, diagnosis, or treatment provided by your healthcare practitioner. Management decisions should always be based on personalised clinical evaluation.
Please Share With Those That May Benefit
There is a great deal of misinformation and oversimplified advice online regarding musculoskeletal and spinal conditions. If you have found this page helpful, you are very welcome to share it with anyone who may benefit from clear, evidence-informed information.
Please share the page in full via direct link. Reproduction, copying, or republishing of the written content or images without permission is not permitted. Producing accurate educational material of this depth takes significant time, clinical experience, and ongoing review — and I choose to keep it freely accessible for the benefit of patients and healthcare professionals.
Responsible sharing is genuinely appreciated.
Shoulder Impingement Syndrome FAQ's
1) What is the difference between shoulder impingement and subacromial pain syndrome?
The terms are often used interchangeably. “Impingement” traditionally described mechanical compression of the rotator cuff under the acromion. “Subacromial pain syndrome” is a broader, more modern term that reflects the role of tendon overload, bursal irritation, and load intolerance rather than simple bone-on-tendon contact.
2) Does shoulder impingement mean something is trapped or being crushed?
Not usually. While compression does occur during overhead movement, most cases are driven by tissue sensitivity and reduced load tolerance rather than structural trapping. Many people have reduced subacromial space without any pain.
3) How long does subacromial impingement take to heal?
Mild cases may improve within several weeks. More established cases often require 3–6 months of progressive rehabilitation. Recovery depends on restoring strength and load tolerance rather than simply waiting for inflammation to settle.
4) Can shoulder impingement heal without surgery?
Yes. Most cases improve with well-structured rehabilitation focused on strengthening and progressive loading. Surgery is usually considered only when conservative management has been delivered properly and symptoms persist.
5) Is a corticosteroid injection necessary for shoulder impingement?
Not always. Injections may help reduce pain in highly irritable cases, but they do not restore strength or tendon capacity. They are best viewed as an adjunct to rehabilitation rather than a standalone solution.
6) What exercises are best for subacromial pain syndrome?
The most effective exercises are those that progressively strengthen the rotator cuff and scapular muscles while respecting irritability levels. There is no single “magic” exercise — progression and load tolerance are more important than the specific movement.
7) Why does my shoulder hurt more when lifting overhead?
Overhead movement increases compressive and tensile forces within the subacromial space. If the rotator cuff or bursa is sensitised or under-conditioned, these forces may exceed current tissue tolerance and provoke pain.
8) Can bone spurs cause shoulder impingement?
Bone spurs can be present in some individuals with shoulder pain, but they are also common in people without symptoms. A spur on imaging does not automatically mean it is the cause of pain. Clinical correlation is essential.
9) How is shoulder impingement different from a rotator cuff tear?
Subacromial pain syndrome typically involves pain-limited movement with preserved passive range. A rotator cuff tear often presents with marked weakness, particularly after trauma. Imaging and strength testing help differentiate the two.
10) Should I avoid using my shoulder if I have impingement?
Complete avoidance is rarely helpful. Controlled, progressive loading helps improve tendon capacity and restore resilience. The aim is to reduce overload — not eliminate movement entirely.
Why Should You Choose Chris Heywood Physio
Choosing the right physiotherapist can make a significant difference when dealing with pain, injury, or persistent movement problems. The most important thing when seeking help is finding a practitioner you trust—someone who is honest, responsible, and clear about your diagnosis, the treatment you really need, and whether any follow-up appointments are necessary.
I’m not here to poach you from another therapist, but if you’re looking for a new physiotherapist in Northamptonshire or simply want a second opinion, here’s why many people choose to work with me (read my reviews):
Over 25 years of experience & proven expertise
With 25+ years of hands-on physiotherapy experience, I’ve built a trusted reputation for clinical excellence and evidence-based care. My approach combines proven techniques with the latest research, so you can feel confident you’re in safe, skilled hands.
Longer appointments for better results
No two people—or injuries—are the same. That’s why I offer 60-minute one-to-one sessions, giving us time to:
-
Thoroughly assess your condition
-
Provide focused, effective treatment
-
Explain what’s really going on in a clear, simple way
Your treatment plan is tailored specifically to you, aiming for long-term results, not just temporary relief.
Honest advice & support you can trust
I will always tell you what is best for you — even if that means you need fewer sessions, not more. My goal is your recovery and long-term wellbeing, not keeping you coming back unnecessarily.
Because I operate an independent practice with low overheads, I do not work to preset business targets based on a number of sessions per patient. Treatment recommendations are based on clinical need only, not on maximising appointments.
If you are interested in this topic, you can read more in my article “Do You Really Need Weekly Private Physiotherapy Sessions?”
Helping you take control of your recovery
I believe the best outcomes happen when you understand your body. I’ll explain your condition clearly, give you practical tools for self-management, and step in with expert hands-on treatment when it’s genuinely needed.
Independent clinical care
Chris Heywood Physio operates as an independent physiotherapy practice rather than a high-volume clinic model.
This allows treatment decisions to focus entirely on what is most appropriate for the patient.
The aim is always to understand the problem properly and provide clear, effective physiotherapy that helps you return to normal activity as quickly and safely as possible.
Contact Me
Alongside private practice, I also work on Mondays and Tuesdays as a First Contact Practitioner (FCP) in Musculoskeletal Primary Care within the NHS, assessing, diagnosing, and triaging patients without the need for a GP appointment.
You’re very welcome to call, but when I’m in clinic my phone is often on silent so I can give my full attention to the patient I am seeing. For this reason, it is usually quicker to reach me via the contact form, email or WhatsApp.
Whichever way you get in touch, I will respond as soon as possible — and during the week that is almost always the same day.
Clinic Information
The Clinic In located in:
Scaldwell Village
Northants
NN6 9LA
** Please note that Home Visits, Online Sessions and Aquatic Therapy can often be arranged outside of normal clinical hours on request.**
Opening Times
Monday & Tuesday: Closed for FCP Work
Wednesday - Friday: 0915 - 1400
Saturday & Sunday: Closed
